![reimage limited reimage limited](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/6VMAAOSw4g9f9QZb/s-l300.jpg)
First test I did by uncompressing the Exe to a folder myself.
![reimage limited reimage limited](http://www.reimage-plus.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/reimage-summury.jpg)
Since youre paid service requires that you have a paid account and the ability to use the browser and activeX to get to use the Reimage program to repair.
#Reimage limited drivers
There should be a focus on creating a small XP build, including alot of drivers that brings up minimal XP and a browser.
#Reimage limited download
When is a user going to be able to download a 133MB exe, if their system is down. Also noticed a Thumbs.db in Reimage folder. Whe you run it, there no actual notice to where its being installed and it doesnt create a shortcut to the main application that is suppose to be used. I tested the Download offered: winconsole.exe So, why don't we start this kind of "re-branding" and "cross-referencing". I agree with this and alot of youre statements of not having an open ended winbuilder Projectd for the user to use.
![reimage limited reimage limited](https://reimage.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Reimage.jpg)
Reimage the fame of "customer oriented firm" that recommends an "easy, great" app, the average final user a rewarding experience, the more technically oriented or curious users a new thing to play with and eventually join boot-land, contributing and sharing ideas about the project. Once the end users will have had the gratifying experience of a working build, some of them will come here, and try the "real thing".Ī: Winbuilder and boot-land the fame of "easy, great" app. In other word a pre-configured (and alas "limited") build that is guaranteed to work at first attempt on a wide number of systems, with some "advertising" about boot-land and the Winbuilder "full-version". This Reimage.script is not anything else that one of our "base" projects, with:ġ) NO choice about booting method (Ramdisk/Iso/Sdi/etc.)Ģ) NO choice about multibooting, AIO, etc.ģ) NO choice about shell (Explorer, bb4win, etc.)Ĥ) NO choice about file manager (Explorer, A43, etc.)ĥ) NO choice about internet browser (IE, Firefox, Opera, offby1, etc.)Ħ) NO choice but among a limited number of "sets" of programs Now imagine that we have a "limited" Winbuilder engine, possibly "branded" with Reimage logo/info, that can ONLY run a single project, called (as an example) Reimage.script. scripts, ANY of them.įor this particular scope (being useful to end users) this capacity is not needed and paradoxically counterproductive. Reimage the as well easily spread fame of "stupid firm" that recommends a "stupid, not working" app, the final user a frustrating experience. Ī: Winbuilder and boot-land the easily spread fame of "stupid, not working" app.
![reimage limited reimage limited](https://procrackfree.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Reimage-PC-Repair-2019-License-Key-Crack-Keygen.jpg)
scripts and press the "Fire" button, you are just like a child in a candy store.Ī: Most probably an unbootable something, or, if you are lucky, a working build with a log error (and thus a number of not working apps/features) long from here to the moon. You download Winbuilder, knowing nothing about it and not having time/will/knowledge/experience enough to start reading the docs, searching the site, find your way to use it.Ī: Select ALL possible servers, projects and included. scripts, is called in jargon "featuritis".įor a moment forget your technical experience and knowledge, and particularly that related to PE based systems, and try to imagine yourself as the typical end user. The root of this all, besides the obvious problems (collateral damages )caused by the continuous updating and bettering of both the engine and of the. I mean, we have lately experienced on the Forum an increase of posts by people that had troubles with Winbuilder, mostly with VistaPE, but also with LiveXP. As often happens, I somewhat (read almost totally ) disagree.